A Comparative Study Between the Theory of Mudogasu of Chuntae
A Comparative Study Between the Theory of Mudogasu(ÙíÔ³Ê¦áóÖå) of Chuntae and the Theory of Dobulyŏngsu(Ô³ÜôéÄáóÖå) of Majo
Cha, Cha-Seok / Wonkwang Univ.
This study inquired into a system of thought, both the theory of Mudogasu(ÙíÔ³Ê¦áóÖå) by Wondon-Jigwan(êÔËòÎº) of Chuntae(ô¸÷»), and the theory of Dobulyŏngsu(Ô³ÜôéÄáóÖå) by Majo-Doil(Ø©ðÓÔ³ìé) who established the denomination of Hongju(ûóñ¶ðó) and also considered two ideas in their similarities. Althought two great thinkers each belonged to the different sects, it is instructive what there are so many analogousness in their thoughts. Prior to Jieui of Chuntae, in other words, the prominent Buddhist philosophers in China shared the thought foundation of Jeuksaeedo(ñíÞÀì»Ô³) which was established by refinedly uniting the theory of Cheyŏng-sangjeuk(ô÷éÄßÓñíÖå) with the theory of Daeseung -gyŏng(ÓÞã«ÌèÖå) by tradition of China.
However, because they belonged to the different sects, it goes without saying that we can also find some points of difference between two philosophers, but it looks a bit detailed for their similarities on generalization of spiritual discipline. Also, which is not that large when we take consideration into the difference of religious personality and their background of culture and thought. These differences result from unlike vision about the world of two philosophers.
It is natural that we have to assume a cautious attitude to jump to the conclusion how the prominent Buddhist philosophers or campaigners effect on each other sequentially. Before all, they were around two hundred years away from one to another. In the next place, it is difficult to demonstrate how two philosophers have an effect and were influenced by each other through philological materials. If one was influenced by another, Of course, it is in the right that Majo was affected by Chuntae. It was known that many Buddhist monks like Budaesa(Ý¡ÓÞÞÍ), Udu-bubyung(éÚÔéÛöë×), Nam yang-Hyechung(³²¾çÇýÃæ) and so on were influenced by Zen of Chuntae(ô¸÷»àÉ) throughout that 200 years. However, we cannot also draw a conclusion that they have an effect and were influenced, assuming various probabilities on their mutual influence.
Two philosophers-both Chuntae and Majo-are outstanding philosophers to contribute greatly in the history of the Chinese Buddhism. The thoughts as Dobulyŏngsu which was known Majo asserted himself for the first time were already in Wondon-Jigwan of Chuntae and these thoughts had enormously affected Namjongsun(ÑõðóàÉ) in the Dang(ÓÐ) and Song(áä) dynasty since then. Therefore, I think it involves consideration from various angles for these reasons. In my thought, again, it is instructive that it became an opportunity to trace the origin of thought that made way for generalization, post-absolutization and post-popularization of spiritual discipline.